Wednesday, February 21, 2007

So-Called Media You Should Avoid

We’ve been so busy beating up bad pitches, we forgot to warn you about the “so-called media.”

Some call them pay-for-play media. They are trade magazines and cable television shows that really want to do a story on your company, the CEO and their story—for a price.

Pay-for-play requests can cause more trouble than they’re worth. Some of the YoungPRPros asked us to unmask these Fourth Estate pretenders so you’ll be ready when you get the call. And if you’re doing your job, you’ll get the call.

Who Are They?
The outlets all have very general business names like U.S. Business Review and American Executive on the print side. TV brings us World Business Review and Pick of the Week. No big names here. And trolling their sites, the companies they profile are equally below the radar.

How Do They Work?
The reporter/producer takes a top down approach. Their assumption is that the CEO has an ego and they will delegate the opportunity to their PR people. They also assume that if the request comes from the CEO’s office, their request suddenly takes on more importance and urgency.

The CEO’s office should delegate all media requests automatically—as should the rest of the company. It’s our job to screen every request against the organization’s communication goals and objectives and only move ahead on the ones warranting our expert’s time and attention. These opportunities rarely do.

Why Do They Suck?
OK, suck is a relative word, subjectively defined. But we see a few problems.

1) No Focus: An article about shipping and logistics will run next to an article about medical technology and financial services. The content is so broad, and the circulation so small, that it’s very doubtful you hit your target market.

2) Multiple Ways to Make Money: Some, but not all of the print opportunities require actual payment. This gives the sales people wiggle room and a way to keep you on the phone.

Some of the magazines will request your company’s vendor list. They then call the vendors and ask them to support their client by running an ad with their client’s editorial.

Then after the article runs, there are reprints. All of them will push you to get reprints. And these folks are aggressive. A client of mine actually sent them a cease and desist letter.

3) Star Power: The TV shows are “hosted” by “celebrities” like Louis Gossett, Jr., Alexander Haig, Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr. and Terry Bradshaw. The shows are broadcast in the wee hours of the morning/evening.

People question the effectiveness of a Super Bowl ad; why would you spend thousands of dollars to be included in a TV program you’ve never heard of that will be broadcast when no one is watching TV?!

How Should I Handle Them? If Schofield Media, Red Coat Publishing, or a production company you’ve never heard of contacts you with an opportunity that sounds too good to be true, get to the point. Ask them if there is a cost involved.

Then tell them the truth. You’re focused on earned-media opportunities and you/the client/your company does not have funds budgeted for paid media requests.

If your client or CEO is interested in it, show them it’s simply not worth it.

“Once you factor in cost and projected outcome, it's easy to demonstrate whether a given effort will be the best expenditure of resources. If you start at the right place, the result is easy,” notes Rich Barger on YoungPRPros. “If you're programming based on objectives -- helping your client change actions, attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, and opinions in measurable ways -- then it's easy to point out how such "opportunities" do or do not help the client achieve their goals.”

Trust me. I speak from experience when I say, just say no to pay for play media requests.

Scum @ Work uploaded by Tourista de Mancunia

tags | public relations | PR | media relations | media | good pitch | bad pitch | bad pitch blog

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

I've use World Business Review. But we did it soley to give our out-of-practice CEO some much needed practice in front of a camera. (Plus, he loves showing video of himself in our lobby.) And you're right about their sales practices. Their sales person convinced our CEO to purchase more air time, costing us $15K.

Susan Getgood said...

Another clue -- a lot of the video outfits seem to be located in Florida, so if you don't recognize the "show" name from the list above, check the area code on the phone message :-)

sherrilynne said...

If you resort to this, you've failed your client.

Kristen said...

Ironic-- just came across this today with an outlet in NYC, WallStreetReporter. Went straight to the CEO, and request trickled down.

They're posting the interview online for 48 hours, and requesting 12K for a recording, transcript, plus a bunch of other useless crap. Really pisses me off.

Kami Huyse said...

When I was in inside PR, I got one or two calls like this every year. I always said no thanks.

Kevin said...

Thanks everyone for chiming in on this. It happens more than folks realize and it helps to know how to respond.

Anonymous said...

World Business Review is the WORST. They make it sound like they have a show coming up with just your topic, and do the hard sell on your execs and get them all jazzed about it before you can tell them the kicker - I think it's up to 19k now, plus travel of course. And they don't give up... I've literally, for more than one client, had to ask them to stop calling.

Jason O said...

"The Wall Street Reporter" from NYC got me - I had a public company asking for NY coverage, they pub called and I thought it was the biggest blessing, right out of thin air and nice and easy. I started writing an email to the CEO but thankfully ran it past my manager - she put the breaks on so fast and said "No way! This pub will ask for the money after they've done the interview." I called back the reporter, said no thanks b/c of the pay-for-play aspect, and he actually got pissy with me. I learned my lesson. I think. ;)

Janet said...

My previous employer did a story with U.S. Business Review about two years ago. Avoid them like the plague!Don't do it! We did the story and:

1. It was poorly, poorly written; my 12 year old son could have done better.

2. They didn't want money like the other 99 bogus phone calls we get in a given week, they wanted our vendor's names and phone numbers so they could sell them ads in our article. We begrudgingly gave them half the list they wanted.

The vendors FREAKED OUT!

The names we gave them were our "Tier 2" vendors. If we gave up our real suppliers and this happened, I would have been fired.

Anonymous said...

Over the past three years that I've worked for a very high-profile company, I have been continually contacted by these pay-for-play outlets.

They're very tricky, since many of the "reporters" deny that these so-called editorials come with a price tag. Even if you decline, they're very persistent.

Also, has anyone noticed that they seem to all call at the same time, within a week or two of each other? They don't bother your for months or even a year, then all of a sudden, they all come out of the woodwork. Guess they need to meet their sales quotas.

Because of shady operations such as these, whenever I receive a phone call form "media" and the background sounds like the "reporter" is calling from a call center or telemarketing office, I immediately tell them "no thanks," and hang up!

Anonymous said...

I am not certain about the ethics in the US and perhaps some specialities would permit it, but I would consider this unethical "PR" and would never advise its use.

PR Consultants
clearpr@gmail.com

Anonymous said...

I'm not certain about the ethics in the US and perhaps it would be permitted by some specialities, but I would conider this unethical "PR" and would never advise its use.

PR Consultants
clearpr@gmail.com

Anonymous said...

Watch out for any "reporters" associated with Multi-Media Productions, Inc.

Tourista de Mancunia (aka Jon Shack) said...

Thanks for linking back to my photos, would have been nice if you'd asked though! Interesting use of my photo all the same! Regards Jon

Jack Marks said...

The fact of the matter is that "pay for play" media is a very cost effective way to get eye-balls.

Ultimately that is what your clients are paying you for.

Just add up how much money your PR clients are paying for every media placement you get them....

WallStreetReporter.com offers GUARANTEED visibility to a qualified investor audience.

Our interviews receive anywhere from 5,000-120,000 listens/views over the course of a 3 month run.

(Yes, we have documentation)

At a price (investment) of just $9,850, any successful marketing professional will you this is a powerful return on investment.

We have numerous case studies of client companies who created massive shareholder value as a result of exposure on WallStreetReporter.com.

The fact is not one PR person on this blog offers "guaranteed visibility".

Your PR clients have to pay you monthly retainer fees in the HOPES of you actually getting them a "free" media placement.

How many "free" placements do you get them? Now divide that by the annual fee you charge. That's the actual cost.


Any successful business person knows, NOTHING is "free".

I invite all true PR professionals to use Wall Street Reporter and actually do something to create value for your clients.


Jack Marks
Publisher
Wall Street Reporter Magazine
(212) 363-2600 ext 260

Anonymous said...

The same scumbags at Schofield Media, Ideal Media and Red Coat Media, have opened up shop in Los Angeles under the name of Mayfair Business Media.

This is an attempt to fly under the radar, Mayfair isn't even listed on the corporate site as a division.

I never thought it was possible, but Schofield Media has sunk to a new level of shadyness.

Anonymous said...

I live in Chicago and it is worth noting that Schofield has had numerous off-shoots open up in recent years. The founder of one of them chuckles when making new recruits sign a non-disclosure form and then confesses his venture was borne out of Schofield's (former) lack of these secrecy agreements.

Check out any of the following BS, fake circulations ADVERTORIAL rags:

http://www.usdevelopersjournal.com/

http://www.americanbuildersquarterly.com

Anonymous said...

Schofield-Media is an absolute joke. The ONLY way they will run a story on a company is IF the company gives their Vendor list so Scumfield can sell them advertisement. No ads sold, no story running, plain and simple. They will ruin any and all relationships a company may have with their suppliers/vendors.

BEWARE of this company if you value your vendors/suppliers.

Anonymous said...

We and many of our customers have fallen for Schofield's BS. Don't tell them anything. Their unethical sales people will twist whatever you say and threaten to ruin your relationship with your customer. They even tried to pit several employees of our company against one another by telling lies about what the other said. All this to get us to buy an ad in their magazine that most manufacturers have never even heard of. In the future I plan to call any of our customers solicited by Schofield that have named us as a vendor to warn them.