
One of the more frequent questions asked of the Bad Pitch blog is “what’s the difference between pitching journalists and bloggers?”
We used to assume that the main difference was that pitching bloggers requires hyper-customization. And while they do, it’s deeper than this – there’s a bigger difference.
80/20 RuleIf we did an analysis of all the ham-fisted pitches sent our way, I’ll bet that 80 percent or more of them are originally aimed at bloggers.
This 80/20 rule has always bothered us. Why are pitches more prone to piss off bloggers than journalists? It’s not like misguided PR people send their “Sunday best” pitches to the media and “casual Friday” pitches to the bloggers. That maneuver would require something other than the rampant mass pitching that takes place.
After receiving thousands of pitches over the last three plus years, we can tell you that the bad ones suck consistently across the board.
What’s the Difference?At the risk of oversimplifying, and pissing off our friends from the fourth estate (again), I’ll start out by saying…
…the difference between journalists and bloggers is paid vs. passion.
* Paid: First let me be clear and note that passion is required to turn a job into a career. Journalism is no different. I mean, who hasn’t watched “All the President’s Men” and thought “How amazing would it be to help right wrongs of national magnitude by day and chill with people code-named Deep Throat at night?”
But for the most part, journalists are paid to do their job. And with every job there are things you put up with in exchange for the rest of it – and your paycheck. Bad PR pitches become a cost of doing business.
When we talk live to journalists, instead of via email (gasp!), they usually tell us about their bad pitches. The journalists consider sending them our way, but they “never get around to it.”
The journalists are getting the same bad pitches the bloggers are getting. They’ve just developed a tolerance over the years. That twice-monthly paycheck is a powerful antibiotic to fend off the ill of bad pitches.
* Passion: From NASCAR to knitting, if you start a blog for any other reason than passion for that topic, it will be hard going. Passion fuels push-button publishing. Sometimes passion is the only thing fueling the effort.
More often than not, bloggers are not getting paid; they haven’t monetized. And unlike Mommy bloggers, many aren’t having largess foisted upon them by marketers at such levels that a swag recycling station has to be set up at one of their industry conferences (a topic for another post on another blog).
So when you send a ham-fisted pitch to a blogger? You’re tossing cold water on their passion. You’re implying you don't really care about their favorite topic. I’m more likely to take a bad pitch personally than a grizzled newsroom veteran who can filter through them without even thinking twice.
Church & StateFrom paid vs. passion, let's look at paid vs. earned media. Journalists are usually never involved with ad sales. There’s a church and state separation between paid and earned media so the journalists can focus on the content and the end product can remain unbiased.
The bloggers that are making money from their efforts are usually a solo operation. They’re church, state and everything else in between. Can bloggers remain unbiased in these situations? Many certainly do so. But it’s been a slippery slope. It’s been so slippery that the FTC is all up in our grill over disclosure.
Pitch Early vs. OftenWhen working with bloggers another issue is timing. Everyone assumes that bloggers move at the speed of social media. The technology certainly permits them to live blog, live tweet and send photos from the field. But even the pitches that make the cut can get pushed to the side when life happens.
Most bloggers do this in their free time. If they have a job and a life, blogging takes third place. It should take third place (the author reminds himself).
It’s frustrating. But there’s a way to mediate this issue. If we recognize that bloggers have less than predictable publishing cycles, and we start pitching them earlier, we’re more likely to see success.
We need to start comparing their publishing cycle more to trade publications than the AP Newswire. Trade journalists work an average of three months in advance and don't have an international newswire to distribute their stories as needed. Bloggers do have this access to technology, but it doesn't mean they have to use it.
So the real difference between journalists and bloggers are their motivations. Motivations define their deadlines and their receptiveness to pitches. Keep all of this in mind when preparing your next round of pitches. And get motivated!
* posted by @prblog
The Uptake: Press Badge uploaded by Chuckumentary






12 comments:
Here's another difference between bloggers and journalists.
Blogs like this POS attack people without so much as a phone call to find out what the attackee has to say.
And journalists make that phone call because they are pros and not useless wankers like Richard.
Yes, we're not letting the hendrix thing go.
Laermaer has no credibility whatsoever. He sux.
Anonymous, I agree with you that making a phone call can make a big difference when you're trying to get your story covered.
However,posting a comment distroys your credibility. If you have something to contribute (even if it's an angsty critique of the author) I'm sure that it's welcome here--but not in this way. It's disrespectful to the community and to the professional blogger who works to improve our community to write such haphazard comments anonymously.
Very good post, Richard. Another point I'd add: I think pitches to bloggers attempt at times to establish a loose, buddy connection, which often rings false.
Steve Baker
First, all these Anonymous postings are done by Mike Hendricks. Everyone should know that by now. And Mike: thank you for making me feel like David Geffen- all powerful and stuff. And all regular readers and participants: Let's just call this constant bugging of the Hendricks post (from last month, yet) what it is: as my pal @susanejacobsen reminded me today, the real definition of anonymous is: “lacking individuality, unique character or distinction.”
Second. Adding to what Steve Baker said: the false "buddy" connection pointed out is something we've been attempting to rid the PR world of. 1) No one is doing anyone a favor in the world of media/blog relations; everyone has a job to do . 2) The fact is: if your story or angle is good, make sure you're resolute about it and 3) the real problem with "blog pitching" if you will, is that most PR people (and their clients) don't understand how blogs work. Spending some of that time where you'd SMS your friends actually reading blogs in many industries will demonstrate how blogs get filled up with loads of new ideas from many distinct sources. Then you can contribute without looking like, sorry, a flack.
Nuff said.
Thanks for the contributions, everyone!
Richard
Good post Richard. And as I wrote you privately sometime back, journalists understand that there are pearls worth diving for in the PR Sea. Woodward & Bernstein had PR contacts, too. Theirs were just a bit more covert.
Steve, nolavampire: thanks for the kind words. Just to be clear, I wrote the post. :-)
Thanks again. Cheers!
-- Kevin Dugan, @prblog
co-author BPB
I think you bring up excellent points when talking about pitching bloggers.
The fact that many are derived from passion - and some may actually be an extension of a hobby or a personal interest - may indicate that they are not too interested in what PR folks have to say.
The vast majority of blogs do not stand the test of time, anyway. Those that do stand the test of time are far more "serious" blogs.
The other thing is that many blogs have notions already set. It would be difficult to engage in PR that is contrary to their beliefs.
Over time, some blogs may be more receptive, but as it stands, I think a blogger, who is a hobbyist and pursuing a passion, may be unwilling to face the pile of press releases I regularly faced in my journalism career.
Clay - Thanks for commenting. Your point about serious vs. less than serious blogs is interesting. As you note, will they be prone to listen to differing points of view? Hopefully over time. But more often than not, the pitches I see are less trying to get me to see a differing viewpoint. Most of them are simply off target. Thanks again.
PLEASE dont start editing out the 'Anonymous' comments. This has gone from an entertaining blog to the 'best soap opera attached to an entertaining blog' EVER! I love that there are some less than subtle colloquialisms in the posts - like the use of 'Wanker' and 'SUX' and the misspelling of Hendricks.
Online stalking is the new reality TV!
Rob.
Good perspective, Richard. I had a similar, if not differently articulated blog post a couple of months back on how a PR firm should approach journalists Vs bloggers and the basic difference between what/ who they should consider as bloggers. I had used one single criteria to make the differentiation - motivation.
Another issues is with organized blog/ news outfits. For instance, would you call Techcrunch a blog or a news (journalistic) website?
They have the passion and they get paid, from the ads/ sponsorship etc. But, they would cover tech. news, in any case, since that's their mainstay - the tone and manner they cover news may differ, but given their target readership, they'd be obliged to bring them the latest in tech. news. I had considered an Indian example in my post, but I guess the TC example holds good too.
Some of the comments to my post would be interesting for you too. Take a look,
http://itwofs.com/beastoftraal/2009/05/06/blogger-engagement-what-is-a-blog-but/
California - Central Coast writer to be nationally aired on WNB West on September 21st, 2009.
Writer and Photographer John Crippen will be interviewed on 'The Author's Show' hosted by Internet Talkshow Host Don McCauley . Crippen, the writer of
"The Sweet Smell of ASH in the Morning" will talk live about his book, a humorous dedication to Atascadero State Hospital and also talk about the difficult struggles
of the healthcare system. This book also takes a lighter look at what it's like to be a
Psychiatric Technician in the largest freestanding forensic mental Institution in the world.
As a 13 year veteran Psychiatric Technician, and former Atascadero State Hospital Employee, Crippen has a lot of funny stories to tell about the hospital. The talk show will run on the 21st, and be placed in a loop for the entire day. To hear the internet talkshow, visit the link below.
The book is currently available on Amazon.com as well.
http://www.wnbnetworkwest.com/WnbAuthorsShow.html
Sometimes I wonder what the heck is wrong with everybody?
Americans aren't getting the news and information they want from traditional channels, and blogs are helping to give Americans what they are looking for.
This is not rocket science. As a journalist or reporter, one may be known as a professional, but also, as someone whose motive is entirely that of a job, a paycheck, and being a professional.
LOL. On that third count, "being a professional", well, you can take that to your grave, because it still doesn't give a damn about the news, or of getting the news to the American people. It just wants to be a professional. Isn't that sucky?
I think it is. These people show job and paycheck as motive - period. We'll add "a sense of professionalism", but we'll skip the part about responding to the needs of the American people, because that doesn't seem to have anything to do with it.
I just, latest example, am sick of tuning into the Novermber news from the Ukraine with its flu, such that I have to leave all American news behind just to do it.
But they certainly are professionals, aren't they? Too bad their all fired, and being replaced by bloggers, where it is then said that people's needs were being met.
- Mark
Post a Comment